Scarcity of the World essays

Scarcity of the World essays The science of economics depends on whether society lives in abundance or scarcity. The economy is the careful management of wealth or a system of producing and distributing wealth. Abundance is having more than enough, a great plenty. Scarcity is the belief that nothing is plentiful. It is usually hard to get. Society today is involved in one big competition. People are always competing to get the things they need or want in life that will make them happy. People dont worry about the starving people that dont have the things they need because people are so worried about not having enough for themselves. It seems like people are so worried about scarcity that they will do anything to survive. They dont want the effects of scarcity, not having enough of what they want or need. Palmers argument is excellent. His idea is easily comparable to the story of Jesus feeding of the five thousand. The way Palmer breaks down the story of Jesus feeding of the five thousand and compares it to the world now really makes us think about some things. First of all, why have that many people, including myself, not thought about this and taken action. The assumption of scarcity really must have got a hold of society very fast. The assumption of scarcity has been taken up by most everyone including myself. It would make a lot more sense if everyone would come together in little communities and help each other to develop abundance instead of everyone feeling threatened by anyone else and choosing to walk the road alone. When you are by yourself, you are living in a world of scarcity because you can only depend on yourself and how much money you have. You dont have the reassurance that, if you needed help or something lent to you, that you could go to someone in yo ur community that would be able to help you. When you are alone you only have what you know. Scarcity is worse when it comes to emotiona ...

Charless Pen and Jesus Name

Charless Pen and Jesus Name Charless Pen and Jesus Name Charless Pen and Jesus Name By Maeve Maddox Commenting on When to Form a Plural with an Apostrophe, Luke S. raised another question: What gripes me . . . is the misuse of the apostrophe to form the possessive without the extra s: Charles pen needs correction to Charless pen. Ah, Luke, would it were so simple as that! Even the Chicago Manual of Style, so authoritative in so many ways, makes this observation on the use of the apostrophe to form the possessive: Since feelings on these matters sometimes run high, users of this manual may wish to modify or add to the exceptions. When I taught in England, the textbook I used gave the rule that ancient names ending in -s took only an apostrophe, while modern names took apostrophe s: Achilles heel, Jesus name, St. Jamess Park. This rule was no doubt derived from Fowler: It was formerly customary, when a word ended in -s to write its possessive with an apostrophe but no additional s, e.g. Mars hill, Venus Bath, Achilles thews. In verse, in poetic or reverential contexts, this custom is retained. ..But elsewhere we now add the s the syllable, Charless Wain, St Jamess not St James, Joness children. . . After many paragraphs setting forth the correct use of using the apostrophe to form various possessives, the CMS offers an alternative: Those uncomfortable with the rules, exceptions, and options outlined above may prefer the system, formerly more common, of simply omitting the possessive s on all words ending in s- hence â€Å"Dylan Thomas’ poetry,† â€Å"Maria Callas’ singing,† and â€Å"that business’ main concern.† Though easy to apply, that usage disregards pronunciation and thus seems unnatural to many. This apostrophe business is felt to be of such import that there has even been legislation on it: In February 2007 Arkansas historian Parker Westbrook successfully petitioned State Representative Steve Harrelson to settle once and for all that the correct possessive should not be Arkansas but Arkansass. Arkansass Apostrophe Act came into law in March 2007. ABC News [USA], 6 March 2007. Before you start making jokes about the priorities of the Arkansas legislature, know that no less august a body than the Supreme Court wrestled with apostrophe usage in 2006. Justice Thomas opinion was that whenever a singular noun ends in s, an additional s should never be placed after the apostrophe. The dissenting opinion was that an s should always be added after the apostrophe when forming a singular possessive, regardless of whether the nonpossessive form already ends in s. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Punctuation category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Comparative Forms of Adjectives60 Synonyms for â€Å"Trip†Phrasal Verbs and Phrasal Nouns